Intestinal Entrepreneurial Fortitude

Not everyone is prepared to be a successful entrepreneur.

In the new book Heart, Smarts, Guts and Luck, two successful venture capitalists and a management consultant surveyed a large number of successful entrepreneurs to uncover what traits they have in common.  One of the traits — guts — particularly hit home with my experience as an entrepreneur and as a teacher of entrepreneurs.

The authors argue, and I agree, that guts is not a trait that you are either born with or not.  Having the guts to be an entrepreneur is something that can be nurtured and developed.  They identify three key elements to developing and nurturing guts in entrepreneurs.

Eighty percent of the successful entrepreneurs in this study said that their entrepreneurial guts were developed through experiences early in their lives.

I can cite several experiences from working in our family businesses that helped to toughen my skin.  One in particular stands out.  When I was in grade school my father partnered in a cleaning products distributorship.

Although I was only eleven, I was eager to become a part of this new venture.  So I decided to sell the product door to door.  My first sales call was to our next door neighbor, who was a good friend of our family.

Rather than pat me on the head and buy some product to be nice, she looked me in the eyes and said, “Tell me why I should spend our hard earned money on this stuff?”

I did not make the sale.  I was left speechless and devastated.  It was a hard lesson that I have carried with me the rest of my life.  Nobody owes you anything in business – it is up to you to earn it.

The second key element for developing guts is training and education that prepares entrepreneurs how to make decisions in complex situations.  We urge every student who comes into our program to start a business while they are in school because this kind of training is so important.  It helps them to gain experience, confidence and learn from their mistakes in a safe environment.  However, I am not one who thinks we should require every student to start a business as many schools are moving toward.  I think that making starting a business an assignment misses a key aspect of developing true entrepreneurial guts – the courage to make the choice and cross the threshold to start a venture.

The final element of developing and nurturing guts is becoming part of a community of entrepreneurs.  By joining an ecosystem of fellow entrepreneurs you gain peer support, wise counsel, and a group who can hold you accountable.  We need to have our entrepreneurial guts reinforced, nurtured, and checked throughout our career.

Having guts to be an entrepreneur does not imply that you take careless risks – quite the contrary.  Having guts to be an entrepreneur means that you are ready through experience to carefully and prudently manage and mitigate the risks that lie ahead.

Key Partners Support Success

Entrepreneurs cannot achieve success alone.

They need the help and support of a whole host of people who are directly involved in the business, including employees, partners, family members and investors.

Entrepreneurs also need to develop key “partnerships” with people and organizations that are not a direct part of the daily operation.  These partners work closely with an entrepreneur in some way that is important or possibly even critical for the operation of the business.  Even though they are not as directly involved day-to-day as employees and customers, the support of these key partners can be at least as important for a business’s success.

Let’s look at an example of key partnerships for a simple business model.  My students all know that I have one more business start-up in me.  I plan to open a bait shop when I retire from teaching.  Why a bait shop?  My first significant small business experience was running the bait shop for the marina that our family owned in Wisconsin when I was fifteen years old.  So it seems appropriate to me that my last business venture should also be a bait shop!

An entrepreneur can use key partners to help reduce risk by sharing that risk with partners.  In Dr. C’s Bait Shop, I will seek out suppliers who will help reduce the risk associated with my inventory.  Minnows and worms are perishable, so I will work with suppliers that are willing to deliver inventory often and only deliver it when I need it.  That reduces the risk that my inventory will go bad if I have a stormy week that would lead to a significant drop in sales.

Dr. C’s Bait Shop will need a space to operate in a good location.  I will try to find a landlord who will rent me the right building and offer good service at a fair price even though my business is new.  I may even be able to get the landlord to pay to fix up the space I need and add that cost into my rent.  So, key partners can help entrepreneurs secure needed resources without actually spending their precious start-up cash to acquire them.

I will seek out counsel from people with more experience in the industry to help serve as advisors.  I will talk with bait shop owners in other markets and connect with old timers in the Tennessee fishing community.

Finally, I will build legitimacy for my bait shop among angling enthusiasts by volunteering in local hunting and fishing organizations.

Good networking with key partners is much more than just introducing myself and giving them a business card.  I need to earn their support by making the relationships between us mutually beneficial.

So as simple as my bait shop business is to operate, its success depends on building a network of key partnerships.  While being an entrepreneur means you do not work for anyone, it does not mean you don’t work with anyone.

 

Smallness Offers Advantages: Don’t Rush being a Big Business

Something that always gives me pause is when I hear entrepreneurs and their managers refer to their small business as “the company”, or even worse, “the corporation.”

I was talking with an entrepreneur who has two partners and no employees.  Their business seemed to be kind of “stuck.”  They were not getting some important, and yet basic things done to market their business and take better care of their customers.  He kept saying things like “the corporation needs to do this” and “the corporation should do that.”  They were spending most of their time trying to determine who should have what title and how to create a well-defined structure.

I finally said, “Wait a minute!  There are just three of you!  Sit down, make a list of what needs to get done, and divide up the work.  You are ‘the corporation’ so get busy!”

In fairness, the entrepreneur and his partners have big dreams and have a business model that could become a big business someday.  But they will never reach their dreams if they don’t start running their small business the way it needs to be run.

A key advantage that small businesses have is that they are not big businesses.

Small businesses can be nimble and can react quickly to customer needs and changes in the market.  Small businesses can continue to be entrepreneurial and seek opportunity.

As the business grows you will need to add some structure, increase the clarity of people’s roles, and put in some processes and procedures.  But all of this should be done judiciously and slowly.

Small businesses that try to act “big” too quickly run the risk of losing their entrepreneurial culture.  I can tell you from my own experience that once you lose the entrepreneurial spirit in a business, it is very difficult, if not impossible to get it back.

So how do you start to build an organization while still keeping an entrepreneurial culture?

When you delegate, make sure that you don’t just delegate tasks.  You need to delegate the responsibility and the authority to manage the tasks.  Give your employees the ability to make improvements and to react quickly to the market.  Everyone needs to have a sense of “ownership” of what they do.

When you start to create organizational structure for your business, don’t just create positions and reporting relationships to deal with immediate problems and challenges.  Be intentional about the kind of structure you are building and how it will impact your ability to remain entrepreneurial as a business.  Too much bureaucracy can kill innovation very quickly.

When you start to create processes and procedures ask yourself one question:  Is it critical?  While standardized processes and procedures are important to support a growing business, if overdone they can actually inhibit your ability to grow.

When you own a small business don’t be in such a rush act like a “big” business.  Your smallness is part of your competitive advantage.  Find the balance between building an organization and maintaining your entrepreneurial culture.

 

Putting a Crowd Around the Board Table

Crowdfunding, which uses the Internet to generate small contributions of funding from a large number of people, has been getting a lot of attention lately among entrepreneurs.

Crowdfunding primarily has been used to help raise money to support social causes and to help fund struggling artists.  The money received from crowdfunding has to be considered a contribution or a donation.  In most cases, something nominal is usually offered in return for financial support, such as a free download from a musician.

Historically, because of securities laws, small businesses have been unable to use crowdfunding. Until recently, entrepreneurs had only been able to seek funding from a limited number of people who meet specific income and wealth criteria.

A few creative entrepreneurs have used a loophole in the rules to raise money through crowdfunding.  Rather than treat money raised through a crowdfunding campaign as investments, they offer people something of value in return.  For example, a person opening a new brewpub may get people to “donate” to support the start-up by offering free admission to a special opening night event.  The contributions would be motivated by the desire of local beer enthusiasts to support a new local brewery.  The most commonly used websites that promote traditional crowdfunding are Kickstarter and IndieGoGo.

One instantly legendary crowdfunding campaign was implemented by Eric Migicovsky.  He was raising money for his new wrist watch, called Pebble, which pairs with smartphones via Bluetooth.  Contributors were promised they would get preference to buy a Pebble when the watches were introduced to the market.  Although his initial goal was to raise $100,000, Migicovsky was able to raise over $10 million to help launch Pebble.

The recently enacted Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act of 2012 significantly expands the use of crowdfunding for entrepreneurs.  Under the provisions of this bill, those who provide funding through crowdfunding can now become equity investors with ownership in the business.  The JOBS Act opens up the funding of start-ups to allow almost anyone to invest in entrepreneurial ventures.  Several efforts to create crowdfunding platforms under the JOBS Act are being developed, including one in Nashville called InCrowd Capital, being led by Phil Shmerling.

Attracting investors through crowdfunding requires a different approach than when pursuing funding from angels and venture capitalists, who tend to invest more in the entrepreneurs leading the team than in their ideas.

Crowdfunding investors, on the other hand, are attracted to compelling stories and business ideas they can see themselves using.  What led to the success of the Pebble crowdfunding campaign was that people were excited about a completely new technology that they wanted to be the first to own.  Not every product can create that kind of passion and excitement.

The JOBS Act certainly broadens the pool of people who can invest in small businesses and offers an exciting new avenue for raising money for start-ups.

However, using crowdfunding also may make the entrepreneur’s work more challenging.  If adding just one new partner increases the complexity of running a business, imagine what a crowd of partners can do to complicate an entrepreneur’s life!

Muddled Structure can Block Growth

The organizational structure of the typical small business evolves from a series of specific decisions to help manage the challenges presented by growth.

When there becomes too much else to do, the entrepreneur finally decides to stop doing the books and hires a bookkeeper.

As demand increases and more sales opportunities arise, a salesperson is hired to help. When more and more workers get hired, a supervisor is named to manage day-to-day operations. And when a new location is opened, a manager is brought in to help run it.

With each of these decisions the entrepreneur starts to create an organizational structure.

As the business grows, employees are organized into specific functions such as bookkeeping, sales and operations, and eventually someone is put in charge of each of these departments.

While the decisions an entrepreneur makes to handle each specific challenge may make good sense individually, sometimes it doesn’t add up to a complete whole after the structure has been pieced together.

To be effective, the organization’s structure needs to align with the overall market strategy that the business is pursuing.

In their classic book, The Discipline of Market Leaders, Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema identify the three common competitive strategies of successful businesses. They conclude that there is a specific alignment of structure, culture and systems necessary to support the chosen strategy.

The first competitive strategy is operational excellence. This is what a business needs to be efficient, consistent and low-cost.   Burger chain McDonald’s is a good example of this strategy, as its customers want the same food served quickly and inexpensively in every McDonald’s they visit. This strategy works best with what might be called a bureaucratic structure, where decision-making is completely centralized at the top levels of the business with tight controls to ensure consistent performance.

The second strategy is product leadership, in which the business seeks to be the leading innovator in its market. This is a common strategy of many technology businesses. The structure that works best with this strategy is one that is flexible and can quickly adapt to each new product offering.  People are reassigned and reorganized to meet the unique needs of each new product.

The third strategy is customer intimacy. This strategy — as it evolves — must allow any employee to do what needs to be done to meet the needs of the customer.   A common mistake of small businesses is that, as they grow, they try to pursue all of these strategies at once. This is never sustainable over the long run.

Each strategy demands a specific approach to organizing how work gets done.

A key to being a successful venture and managing growth is finding the competitive strategy that works best for the market, and then working to build a structure over time that supports that strategy.

There is no one best structure for all businesses. But there is a best structure for the type of market strategy that a business chooses to pursue. Find it.

Outsourcing for Small Business

Business Tennessee magazine has an interesting article on outsourcing by small businesses. One of the people interviewed is Belmont junior Andy Tabar, whose web development company Bizooki uses developers in India.

Andy Tabar runs a fledgling IT company, Bizooki, out of
Nashville. Starting out with simple Web design, he’s grown into
developing software, but not without some help from afar. Tabar
outsources programming to India, where the burgeoning IT industry has
created plenty of companies eager to take on Bizooki’s projects. Tabar
was reluctant at first to trust strangers with important work. “I’d
always heard horror stories about it,” Tabar says, “but the trick is
having a good relationship with the people you’re outsourcing to.”
Tabar also suggests starting small with minor projects that can’t be
catastrophically ruined if you made the wrong choice. If the
relationship works out, you can move on to bigger operations.
Outsourcing frees up time and energy for Tabar, letting him focus on
other aspects of his business rather than getting bogged down into
micromanaging a project. “It helps having people working for you even
while you’re sleeping, so that I can wake up every morning and things
are ready to go,” Tabar says. With room to grow in other directions,
outsourcing lets a growing business like Bizooki open up new jobs in
other departments, and Tabar plans to grow his local employee base next
year.

Pricing Strategies for Start-ups

My column in this week’s Tennessean looks at pricing strategies for start-ups.

Pricing is one way a business communicates about its products and services to its customers.  The power of pricing to shape what customers think about the quality and value of a product is often underestimated by new businesses.

Science Daily reported on a new study about placebos that demonstrates the psychological power of pricing.  In the study, researchers administered a light electric shock and asked the participants in the study to rate the pain of the shock.  Then all of the subjects were given a placebo (a sugar pill) that they were told was a new pain-killer.  Half of the subjects were told that the cost of the new pain mediation would be $2.50 per dose, while the other half were told that it would cost $0.10 per dose.  “In the full-price group, 85 percent of subjects experienced a reduction in pain after taking the placebo. In the low-price group, 61 percent said the pain was less.”

Why the significant difference in the power of the placebo with the higher price? People often use pricing as a means to judge quality of a product or service. 

There is a great example that comes from the story of a psychiatrist who tried to use pricing to phase out his practice.  He was getting ready to move toward retirement.  So he decided to double his rate for any new clients, assuming that nobody would pay that much for his services.  But, the opposite occurred. Referrals and new patients came in at the highest rate he had ever experienced in his long career in practice.  So he raised his rates again hoping this would do the trick and keep away any more new patients.  However, you guessed it — referrals increased even more.

When a business enters the market with prices well below the rest of the competitive landscape, which is common with many new entrepreneurs, they make a statement to potential customers.  Setting a below market price creates a phenomenon that I call “apologizing to the market.”

It is as if the entrepreneur is saying: “We are not as good as the rest, but hope our low price gets you to buy our product anyway.”

Entrepreneurs need to set a price that puts their product squarely where they want to be in the minds of their potential customers.  “We are as good as the rest.”  Or, “We are better than the rest.”  There is always a risk that you can over price your product and price yourself out of the market.  But, the most common pricing error we see in new businesses is to under price.

Often a new businesses needs to initially offer lower prices to attract customers.  It is best to do this through a temporary discount — through a grand opening sale or coupons.  Make it clear that the discount is to introduce the product so they give you a try. 

When it is hard to objectively evaluate the quality of a product or service, consumers look to other ways to judge quality.  And pricing can be one of the most powerful tools to communicate quality.

The Musician as Artisan

The music industry is facing an interesting puzzle these days How do
you run a business where customers do not want to pay and they do not
want advertising? From today’s Tennessean:

Efforts to sell music by subscription have mainly failed.

Yahoo recently gave up on its Music Unlimited subscription service
and sent its customers to Rhapsody, another struggling music provider.

But traditional radio’s offer of free music surrounded by audio
advertising also is being rejected by a generation that resents
undesirable interruptions.

“They want to be the program director, and they insist that the
program be free,” says Jerry Del Colliano, a professor of music
industry at the University of Southern California and a former
executive at Top 40 WIBG in Philadelphia.

The big boys in the industry do what big boys do in any industry
undergoing fundamental change — they try to get the government to
protect their interests. From TechCrunch (via Andy Tabar):

Warner Music, fully aware that the days of charging for recorded music are coming to an end, is now pushing for a music tax.

This isn’t the first time someone has called for a music tax. Peter
Jenner argued for it in Europe in 2006. Trent Reznor said the same
thing last year (as did the Songwriters Association of Canada)….

But Warner Music is doing more than just talking about a music tax.
They’ve hired industry veteran Jim Griffin to create a new entity that
would create a pool of money from user fees to be distributed to
artists and copyright holders.

We may be witnessing the end of the structure of the music industry
as we know it. The mass produced, mass marketed music is becoming a
relic of the past. And what does the future hold?

The predictions from the Institutue for the Future about the future of small business might offer a glimpse into the future of music:

Today, there are 26 million small businesses in the U.S.
that generate roughly $5 trillion in annual sales. If they were a
country that would make them the 2nd largest economy in the world!
Those numbers will continue to grow over the next decade as small
businesses re-emerge as artisans with even more economic force.

Artisans, historically defined as skilled craftsmen who
fashioned goods by hand, will re-emerge as an influential force in the
coming decade. These next-gen artisans will craft their goods and shape
the economy — through upswings and downturns — with an effect
reaching far beyond their neighborhoods, or even their nations. They’ll
work differently than their medieval counterparts, combining brain with
brawn as advances in technology and the reaches of globalization give
them greater opportunities to succeed.

What would a musical artisan look like? Probably a lot like James Lee Stanley.

My wife and I first heard James Lee Stanley at a “coffee house” in
the 1970s when we were attending the University of Wisconsin — Stevens
Point (WAY up north!!). James Lee was one of many songwriters who made
the circuit performing on college campuses at coffee house events. (As
a note of Entrepreneurial Mind trivia, I played in a couple of coffee
house sessions myself). The songwriters/musicians got a small payment
from the school and were allowed to sell their record albums (for the
younger generation — that is what we used to call “vinyl”).

Fast forward to 2008. One of my winter projects was to convert many
of our old vinyl albums into digital. When I got to our collection of
records from our coffee house days, I decided to “Google” the
songwriters to see what happened to them. Many had faded into obscurity
before the Internet was able to immortalize them in digital splendor.

James Lee Stanley on the other hand was alive and well and still
making the circuit. He had survived as an artisan in the music
industry. He’s got a website. And he has a blog offering
“tips, hints, clues and info for the artist in us all.” His blog
chronicles the life of a musical artisan offering his thoughts on
touring, performing, writing, studio work, contracts, stringing
guitars, and so forth. He still writes music, still records and still
tours.

Why does he continue to perform for well over thirty years? Not for possible fame and not for financial wealth.

What I know is that following your bliss is more rewarding
than making a bunch of money at something you absolutely hate doing. I
don’t feel that I’ve wasted my life or that I could have been more
successful at something else. I love what I do and I love trying to get
better at it and I love it that at my stage of life I still have so
much passion for what I do and I love how vibrant and alive it keeps me.

So what is the future of the music industry? I hope it is not an
industry propped up by government intervention as Warner Music would
have it.

Instead, I hope that it is an industry sustained by talented artists
— and successful artisans — who help us understand love, heart ache,
happiness, sadness, joy, despair. I hope it is full of people like
James Lee Stanley, whose view of success in his career is one we all
can learn something from, be we musicians or be we entrepreneurs.

Preparing for Tough Economic Times

My column in this week’s Tennessean offers some tips on how small businesses can best prepare for the possible tough economic times ahead. This will be a new experience for most entrepreneurs in America thanks to the long economic expansion we have enjoyed for most of the past twenty years.

Unlike the last period of stagflation in the late 1970s, we are now in an entrepreneurial economy — 50 cents of every dollar in the economy is generated by small businesses.
Small businesses are always tight on cash flow. And if their inputs of raw materials and other direct operating expenses go up, they may not be able to pass along these costs quickly enough to keep their cash flow positive. And they certainly don’t have large cash reserves to ride out the recession that is part of stagflation.