So I Guess We REALLY Better Save for Retirement

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (1)

Scientists are envisioning a day in the not too distant future when the retirement age might have to move from 65 to 85. It seems that anti-aging drugs are a real possibility. From Red Herring:

But drugs that prevent aging itself are on the distant horizon, and with them could come dramatic social changes, such as much later ages for everything from puberty to retirement, and massive inequality in life expectancy between those who can afford the life-lengthening compounds, and those who can't. These changes, in turn, would have a significant impact on the global economy.

I guess they would! First, the idea generating part of my brain has kicked into high gear thinking about all of the new businesses that would come out of such a change. But then I started to think about all of the deadbeats who can't even manage to save for the longevity we now enjoy. Does that mean we have to fund social security to cover these people for 40, 50 or even 60 years???

1 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: So I Guess We REALLY Better Save for Retirement.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.drjeffcornwall.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/764

Everything; Blog Posts Videos Photos Music People Events Anti-Aging. PhysioAge Me Read More

Leave a comment

 

Blog header by John Price @ johnpricephoto.com

2008 Top 25 Best Undergrad Schools for Entrepreneurs

Get RSS Feed

Powered by Movable Type 4.34-en

Blog Categories

Blog Categories

Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jeff Cornwall published on February 22, 2006 5:27 AM.

COTC was the previous entry in this blog.

Ethical Challenges with Growth is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Facebook

Facebook

Blog Directory

Business Directory for Nashville, Tennessee